I posted this over the weekend and had not heard
anything. Maybe got lost in the ARRL QRM. Anyone
with comments/thoughts? Ken?
Scott/K7ZO
-----Original Message-----
From: K7ZO <k7zo@micron.net>
To: ct-user@contesting.com <ct-user@contesting.com>
To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
Date: Sunday, March 07, 1999 9:00 AM
Subject: CT 9.39 WPX M/M Serial # Behavior?
>I had a chance to try out last Friday CT 9.39 in preparation
>for WPX SSB at the end of the month. In particular I set up 4
>Station M/M network to see how things worked. I found the
>following somewhat odd behavior.
>
>After entering 2 Q?s on 20M, then 2 Q?s on 10M, then 3 Q?s on
>15M, then 2 Q?s on 10M here is what the display looked like:
>
>1 20 TIME CALL SER#
>2 20 TIME CALL SER#
>3 10 TIME CALL SER#
>2 10 TIME CALL SER#
>5 15 TIME CALL SER#
>2 15 TIME CALL SER#
>3 15 TIME CALL SER#
>8 10 TIME CALL SER#
>4 10 TIME CALL SER#
>
>5 10 ?Waiting for the next 10M Callsign?
>
>What CT looks like it is doing is as follows:
>
>1.) When it logs a Q from a different Station/Band
> than the previous QSO it displays
> a QSO # that is the cumulative total of all Q?s
> made across all bands.
>2.) For subsequent Q?s from the same Station/Band, until
> another Station/Band makes a QSO, it displays
> the QSO # for just that band.
>
>I am not sure which is the intent of the program but
>my guess is that changing back and forth is not the design.
>
>Note that from what I could see this is just a display issue.
>The QSO line always displays the QSO number of the next
>QSO for that band, as is needed in WPX M/M where each
>band has its own serial number set. Also all the log files
>look ok when doing a WRITELOG.
>
>Anyone have any thoughts?
>
>Scott/K7ZO
>
>
--
Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ct/
Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
|