Lyndon,
Thanks for the feedback (and cross-postings to the DX reflector, too...)
Now that we all know that the ARRL is *not* at all "internet challenged,"
(Check out our World Wide Web page at: http://www.arrl.org/),perhaps
we can keep to contest-related issues. Thanks for supporting various
reflectors, Lyndon--I know that I speak for many when I say:
We appreciate it and value your efforts!
Happy Holidays!
73! Glenn, KB1GW
gswanson@arrl.org
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From: Lyndon Nerenberg VE7TCP <lyndon@ve7tcp.ampr.org>
To: David Brian Ritchie
Cc: dx; cq-contest
Subject: Re: INFO response: HELP
>If you want the REAL Stan RULES, you have to get them some other way.
Is this stated in the version published to QST?
(Needless to say, I don't subscribe to it.)
The second issue is the almost complete lack of awareness of
the Internet exhibited by the ARRL (and CQ, and Wayne Green,
and ...). I mirror the ARRL file archives. The archives are
(apparently) only there because BARC volunteers maintain them.
The material is not organized in any readily useful manner.
Much of it is woefully out of date. I have contacted the ARRL
on many occasions to discuss reorganizing and updating the
archives. The response has been stunning silence. I get the
feeling that NIH (not invented here) is their
response to the Internet ...
--lyndon
--
Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org
WWW: http://ve7tcp.ampr.org/Lists/ct-user.html
Questions: reisert@ve7tcp.ampr.org
|