On Thu, 26 Oct 1995 07:43:51 -0600 you wrote:
How about a simple QBASIC program with the following statement
OUT "LPT port address", "ouput byte"
73, Henk
>At 02:00 AM 10/26/95 +0000, you wrote:
>>I think it is safe to say that LPT1 has been broken since 9.23 or 9.24 at
>least.
>>Let's put that rumor to rest. I checked the LPT port pins 1, 17 and 18 and
>>there is NO switching on LPT1 at all in 9.26. LPT2 is fine on 9.26. I
>>confirmed this with two completely different computers.
>
>LPT1 works for me. Tested cw keying and band data on LPT1 with version
>9.26. I'll bet the problem/confusion has to do with enhanced
>(bidirectional) versus "standard" unidirectional LPT ports. The original
>IBM design, while it had a bidirectional buffer, was only an output port to
>the printer because the direction control on the buffer was hardwired to
>ground. I havn't seen any documentation on bidirectional ports (can anybody
>give me a reference) but normal practice with bidirectional ports is that
>they come up in input mode on reset. That's the safe way to do it. In the
>enhanced mode there must be a way to control the direction pin on the buffer
>and a short little program that goes out and sets that bit before loading CT
>would proabably fix the problems. Anybody got any ideas?
>
>Fred KE7X
>Fred Cady (ieefc@msu.oscs.montana.edu)
>
>
>--
>Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
>Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org
>WWW: http://ve7tcp.ampr.org/Lists/ct-user.html
>Questions: reisert@ve7tcp.ampr.org
>
>
Henk Remijn Systems engineer at
PA3EOB (JO11WM) Cargill Wet Milling
Hansweert, The Netherlands Bergen op Zoom
E-mail: hremijn@zeelandnet.nl The Netherlands
pa3eob@pi8goe.ampr.org
PI4ZLD homepage: http://www.hzeeland.nl/~eddy/ham/rdb
--
Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org
WWW: http://ve7tcp.ampr.org/Lists/ct-user.html
Questions: reisert@ve7tcp.ampr.org
|