CT-User
[Top] [All Lists]

No subject

To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
Subject: No subject
From: w5robert@blkbox.COM (w5robert@blkbox.COM)
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 94 16:49:05 -0700
>From ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!pcluster-owner Sat Oct  8 14:05:20 1994 remote from 
>blkbox
Received: from ux1.cso.uiuc.edu by blkbox.COM id aa14800; 8 Oct 94 14:05 CDT
Received: by ux1.cso.uiuc.edu id AA12575
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for pcluster-outgoing); Sat, 8 Oct 1994 11:41:12 -0500
Received: from gatekeeper.mcimail.com by ux1.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP id AA12564
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <pcluster@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>); Sat, 8 Oct 1994 11:41:09 
-0500
Received: by gatekeeper.mcimail.com (5.65/fma-120691);
        id AA16674; Sat, 8 Oct 94 16:44:17 GMT
Received: from mcimail.com by mailgate.mcimail.com id aa10857;
          8 Oct 94 16:40 WET
To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 94 11:40 EST
From: "James R. Hill" <0006429120@mcimail.com>
To: PacketCluster <pcluster@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Pavillion Software
Message-Id: <44941008164044/0006429120PK3EM@MCIMAIL.COM>
Sender: w5robert@mcimail.com
Precedence: bulk

How many of you out there have had problems dealing with Pavillion?

In 1993 I gave Pavillion my credit card number for a years subscription
to Hamcall. I learned later on that Pavillion no longer would handle
Hamcall. I never received a refund.

Two weeks ago I faxed Pavillion requesting CT9. I have yet to hear
from Pavillion.

I think K1EA should look for a different outlet for software as 
Pavillion does not act like a decent company to work with.

Ron/K6OZL


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • No subject, w5robert@blkbox.COM <=