A closing CQ - in replacment of test - is going to be faster to send and
more efficient for rate. The S&P operator tuning across that call and
hearing CQ at the end knows "call immediately" is the next action
warranted. With "test" - he may want to wait for you to call again.
73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com
On 2/19/2025 9:45 AM, PY2NY wrote:
Here...
CQ PY2NY PY2NY Test
And nothing else...
73 DX
.
..
...
--------------------------------
PY2NY / SP9NY / V26NY - Vitor Luis Aidar dos Santos
http://military-jeep-brasil.blogspot.com.br/
Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 às 12:44, dj7ww@t-online.de <dj7ww@t-online.de>
escreveu:
To what extend "test" again?
Typically I send my call twice followed by "test" when running.
Otherwise it is not obvious that I am active calling in the contest and
not calling somebody else.
73
Peter
-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: [CQ-Contest] repeating Callsigns
Datum: 2025-02-19T13:36:25+0100
Von: "Martin Sellschopp" <m.sellschopp@gmail.com>
An: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
I usually send my call twice in run as I am QRP. In S&P only once. What I
find a bad habit also is to send "Test" again after the call in a CQ.
Martin
DK3UW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|