CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RST?

To: JIM STAHL <jimk8mr@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RST?
From: Duncan Fisken <radiog3wzd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 12:54:29 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
That’s what I tell my CW Academy students when I introduce them to contesting; 
5NN means ‘pay attention because what come next is important”.

73
Duncan G3WZD / M3F

Sent from my iPhone

> On 17 Nov 2023, at 01:40, JIM STAHL via CQ-Contest 
> <cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> As I suggested a while back, “5NN” is now a cut number for “Please Copy “
> 
> 73  -  Jim  K8MR
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Nov 16, 2023, at 7:57 PM, w1rm@comcast.net wrote:
>> 
>> I've been a ham since 1956 and worked more than my share of contests.  For
>> as long as forever, RST was an integral part of the qso and exchange.  In
>> days gone by, RST had value, especially the R and T values.  If you had a
>> crappy signal, T was a way to alert the op of that.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> But, fast forward to today, when was the last time you got anything but 599?
>> If you got 227 how would you react?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Signal reports are available through RBN for strength, to see if a band is
>> open, etc., but if you are single op, unassisted, I'm not sure you can even
>> use that.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> So, does RST still have value?  Is it time to retire it?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Pete Chamalian, W1RM
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>