Thanks to W2UP and K3ZJ for responding. This is useful. Hard to believe
these guys are doing over 200 QSOs per hour or >3 per minute. Must be
shortening exchange, maybe no doubling info, no call at end of QRZ, etc.
Not like CW where you can send faster. Speed is fixed by standards. And if
you're running, no unanswered CQs, etc. If you're from a plain vanilla
location like NY, not such high demand. With 300 watts and 80m dipole on 40
and 15m did about 40/hr which I thought wasn't bad, as got lots of
responses from West Coast and Europe. But nothing like these 200 rates.
Thanks for the info.
Barry WA2VIU
--
Barry Jacobson
WA2VIU
bdj@alum.mit.edu
@bdj_phd
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023, 9:29 PM K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com> wrote:
> The information for all three power categories is at this link:
> https://www.cqwwrtty.com/rates/
>
> 73, Dave K3ZJ
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 9:22 PM Barry Jacobson <bdj@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
>> Anybody know what the highest overall sustained rate by single op
>> single-transmitter stations is (assisted and non-assisted)? I can only
>> operate about 3-4 hours over a weekend, but like to know how I am
>> doing compared to the big guys.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Barry WA2VIU
>> --
>> Barry Jacobson
>> WA2VIU
>> bdj@alum.mit.edu
>> @bdj_phd
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 1:20 PM <ed@w0yk.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > https://cqwwrtty.com/raw.htm
>> >
>> > The Raw Scores are now posted for last weekend's CQ WW RTTY Contest.
>> Note
>> > that these scores are computed by the log checking software and may
>> differ
>> > from the Claimed Score computed by the entrant's logging software.
>> >
>> > Raw Scores do not include any reductions for errors found in log
>> checking.
>> > Thus, expect the Final Scores to be lower in most cases. However, the
>> OOF
>> > (Order of Finish) typically does not change except for close scores and
>> > differences in error rate.
>> >
>> > Thanks to all participants and especially those who submitted logs.
>> Logs
>> > will continue to be accepted up until log checking closes in a few
>> weeks.
>> >
>> > 73,
>> > Ed W0YK
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CQ-Contest mailing list
>> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|