Do we know if they were purposefully deleted? ARRL is not the best at
maintaining anything on the web.
Have you written to ARRL to ask? Seems like that would be a good starting
point. Depending on their answer, then it would make sense to socialize the
problem here.
I agree with you that the existing records shouldn't go away just because of
the ARRL choice to allow self-spotting (as bad as that decision was).
Randy K5ZD
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+k5zd=outlook.com@contesting.com> On Behalf
Of kq2m@kq2m.com
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2023 9:52 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated!
Last week I was noticed that my single band ARRLDX contest records and those of
my fellow contesters had been "disappeared", and I suspected that they were
eliminated because now self-spotting was allowed and the LOW Power maximum was
reduced from 150 to 100 watts.
The rationalizations I saw coming out of the ARRL are, IMO, pure BUNK.
Old single band records should persist until or unless they are broken, not
because of some rule change effectively putting SO into the Assisted Class
because of self-spotting, or a 2 db drop in power for LOW power ops. "Old"
records were not eliminated after UBN log-checking started which it tougher to
set new records than the previous records. I am not aware of any practical
reason that necessitates the elimination of existing single op NON-Assisted
records and certainly NOT for SO HIGH power!
In fact, Mark, N5OT states in his excellent write-up that "It's notable that
none of the new category records surpassed any of these now-retired records".
That's PRECISELY my point. It is BIZARRE that a lower score is now considered
by the ARRL to be a "new record" merely because these LOWER scores were made
after 2021. What kind of a "record" is that?
This action by the ARRL completely disrespects the ops and station-owners of
stations where all of those records were set and the effort and strategy
required to set them!
I have never seen pro sports or the Olympics eliminate records just because
rules have been changed, there are new technological advancements, the run-time
of the event has been extended, or for any other reason. Old records that
continue to exist and stand the test time despite more advantaged conditions
now, become the stuff of legends, NOT stuff to be removed.
The ARRL should restore the old records precisely because they ARE the records
and they should be updated only if and when they are legitimately beaten under
the "new" rules and NOT until then.
73
Bob, KQ2M
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.contesting.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcq-contest&data=05%7C01%7C%7C3f6b55b68fc44d4bc96f08db1806e7cc%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638130190174849971%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=gemSR6lomOqnoPlGk4hFlTBNrraQMkSiA1cm157iltw%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|