| To: | "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>, "k9yc@arrl.net" <k9yc@arrl.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] calculating CW duty cycle |
| From: | Keith Dutson <kdutson@sbcglobal.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Jul 2022 22:57:42 +0000 (UTC) |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Not necessary to calculate duty cycle if you have a good transmitter-amplifier.
73, Keith NM5G
On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 03:58:40 PM CDT, Jim Brown
<k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
On 7/4/2022 5:49 AM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
> The duty cycle for CW does not vary with speed.
It does, because the pause between CQs is a component of duty cycle
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] calculating CW duty cycle, Jim Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] calculating CW duty cycle, john |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] calculating CW duty cycle, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] calculating CW duty cycle, David Gilbert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |