CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] AMERITRON ATR-30 on 160M

To: Richard Zalewski <dick.w7zr@gmail.com>, Cq-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] AMERITRON ATR-30 on 160M
From: "Naumann, Robert, W5OV" <w5ov@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:07:09 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Richard,

The simple answer is that the 43' antenna is too short for 160, as-is.

AD5X has written the complete 43' vertical article, and includes several 
solutions to this problem.

The multi-relay switching system he designed using MFJ coil stock and a 4:1 
un-un works very well.

KL7RA(sk) called me a liar when I told him my antenna was a 43' vertical.  He 
said it was impossible for me to have such a strong signal on 160 with a 43' 
vertical.

It worked very well, indeed.

73,

Bob W5OV



-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+w5ov=arrl.org@contesting.com> On Behalf Of 
Richard Zalewski
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 17:02
To: Cq-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] AMERITRON ATR-30 on 160M

Having some issue with the tuner on 160.  Up to 500w all ok but anything above 
that getting some arcing on the Antenna cap.  Checked to be sure all fittings 
are tight.  The tuner on other bands works flawlessly.  Antenna is a Zero-five 
43' vertical.  Saw many comments that the tuner works great on
160 but not me right now.  Open for any ideas.

Richard
*W7ZR* ex:5C5Z, CN2ZR, K2JSP, W6SBZ, W7KXR, K9ZIJ, W9KNF, W0KDF, W0MQU, J68ZR, 
KC6ZR, PJ4/W7ZR, KH2,W7ZR, KH6/W7ZR, V31ZR, VK4AAZ, XE2DV


*Be joyful in hope, patient in affliction, faithful in prayer* 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>