I have an idea – maybe because the callsign was only issued last month? Yep –
that would be it.
Ed N1UR
From: Edward Sawyer
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 5:04 PM
To: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA
Sorry, He would need to use KO1A as his call in order to be compliant. But he
did not.
Why would he not use KO1A as required?
Ed N1UR
From: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com<mailto:w2up.co@gmail.com>>
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 4:52 PM
To: Edward Sawyer
<EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com<mailto:EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>>
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA
That one was easy. Look up the callsign on qrz.com<http://qrz.com>, then do a
name search. It also brings up KO1A.
Next...
Barry W2UP
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 2:28 PM Edward Sawyer
<EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com<mailto:EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>> wrote:
KO7SS wrote: "It would be easier to opine on this situation that is bothering
you if you were to post up the callsigns in question, in public, on this
reflector. There may be aspects of the details you do not know."
Sure, just an example, IZ3EYZ operating as KE5JSY from likely a third station
location in the US. (not KE5JSY - although this is quite unclear) Its simply
recent and relevant to WRTC qualification.
Ed N1UR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|