CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] FTdx-1101MP Impressions

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FTdx-1101MP Impressions
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 14:33:38 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 6/26/2021 12:23 PM, K9MA wrote:
I've only had the radio a week or so, but I'm disappointed in it in many respects. Now, I'm a CW contester, and I'm fussy, so many others will probably not mind what I see as shortcomings. On the other hand, a lot of these issues would concern any serious CW contester. There's no question that the basic performance of the radio, like receiver dynamic range and transmitter IMD, is excellent.

How do you know that? Has someone competent measured these quantities? Other recent (last 5 years) Yaesu products have been notorious for bad splatter on SSB, and have been notorious for clicks for decades.

Here's my list:

1. Very loud relays in QSK with separate rx antenna (much quieter with common tx/rx antenna)
2. Lack of per band power setting memory
3. AGC allows too much audio variation, no setting (this is strictly a personal preference)
4. Clarifier with ring control far too sensitive, even with 5 Hz steps

What's a "clarifier?"

5. CW Sideband changes when changing bands (?)
6. Panadapter lacks averaging mode option

A spectrum display that can't do good averaging is next to useless, and a marketing ploy.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>