CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting and the FT8 Revolution

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting and the FT8 Revolution
From: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 12:37:33 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

You are correct, Paul.  WSJT-X requires operator involvement to initiate every contact, but as you say there are ways around that. There are derivatives of WSJT-X out there that don't have that requirement and can be fully automated, and it is even possible to write a script that automates the "operator" initiation in WSJT-X.

Of course, that doesn't mean that both sides of the contact are fully automated.  I've worked that notorious FT8 bot on the west coast of Africa and while he was fully automated, I was not.

73,
Dave   AB7E



On 6/20/2021 9:25 AM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
On 20/06/2021 13:45, Stan Zawrotny wrote:


You still don't understand FT8. Even if their computer is running 24 hrs a day, WSJT-X will complete only one contact before requiring the operator to
reset  TX.

Please try a search for Automated FT8 on YouTube - you will soon see that, after starting a single QSO, the operator is not required to do anything.

73,
Paul EI5DI




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>