CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Why were there so many busted skimmer spots during WAE?

To: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why were there so many busted skimmer spots during WAE?
From: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:39:32 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Which skimmer were people connected to?  I was linked up via the W3LPL and
the VE7CC programs and noted very few busts.

73 Rich NN3W

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19 PM N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net> wrote:

> Interesting question, Barry.  Any particular pattern you noticed, like
> WAE appended to the callsign, or whatever?  There have been no changes
> to CW Skimmer in years.
>
> Something to consider is connecting to a reliable AR Cluster V6 node
> like NC7J and activating the CT1BOH extensions.  ARC V6 itself also
> includes various filters that can be used to be significantly more
> "skeptical" about the spots you are sent.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
> at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
> spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
> For spots, please use your favorite
> "retail" DX cluster.
>
> On 8/11/2020 8:53 PM, Barry W2UP wrote:
> > Title says it all.  I've never seen so many bad skimmer spots.
> >
> > Barry W2UP (@W4YY for the contest)
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>