Apart from the security issues (meaning it is blocked by firewalls) as
Sterling had mentioned, HTTP is far easier to integrate into modern
applications. Telnet also requires you to open a session and keep it
open. With HTTP you can receive data, disconnect and even retry if
unsuccessful. It's faster and has less overhead than Telnet. You can
pipeline and keep a connection persistent if you wish but it's not
required like Telnet.
73
Ria, N2RJ
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 16:16, N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> I'm curious - why is Telnet "a fact of history"? It seems to work fine for
> most of us.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
> at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
> spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
> For spots, please use your favorite
> "retail" DX cluster.
>
> On 9/5/2019 2:35 PM, Sterling Mann wrote:
>
> Gerry,
>
> Following up on the status of your project. I was at a hamfest recently and
> talked to a guy about telnet's deprecation and it reminded me of your
> pub/sub idea. Understandable if bigger fish came by to fry but if you have
> anything source you could share. i know of a few codemonkeys who could
> help.
>
> Thanks & 73,
> Sterling N0SSC
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 9:37 PM Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org> wrote:
>
> I believe Sterling is looking for an end-user solution. The problem with
> running telnet on port 80 is that it is the well-known http port. You can
> telnet to http and vice versa, but it would not be much fun.
>
> I'm working on a pub/sub service that has an http service endpoint. I'll
> provide a windows app client that will give you spots on telnet using
> localhost (127.0.0.1).
> It should be ready in the next week or so.
>
> For those techies out there, I'm running a RabbitMQ instance on a beefy
> VPS that my AB5K cluster is running on.
>
> Distributed pub/sub is where DX spots should be going; telnet is a fact of
> history.
>
>
> 73,
>
> Gerry W1VE
> dxc.w1ve.com
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2019, 8:30 AM rjairam@gmail.com <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://www.dxcluster.co.uk/api
>
> A lot of APIs in there.
>
> 73
> Ria, N2RJ
>
> On Tue, 21 May 2019 at 19:44, Sterling Mann <kawfey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In a nutshell, I'm on a network that blocks non-standard ports including
> telnet, making it a pain to use DX cluster since I can only access web
> clients like DXsummit.fi. Before I go down the route of begging for
> telnet/non standard port access, is anyone aware of any development of
>
> HTTP
>
> cluster streams? Or maybe a telnet cluster on port 80?
>
> I lack networking expertise so go easy on me.
>
> Thanks,
> Sterling N0SSC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|