CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] FT8 vs FT4 in the Contest

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] FT8 vs FT4 in the Contest
From: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 17:54:01 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I am reading with interest the discussion about the digi contest.  Many people 
were repeating that FT8 was used more than FT4 to "pick up the casuals".  I 
thought that FT4 was a protocol that allowed a contest exchange.  So if the 
contest this weekend had a simple enough exchange (grid) that you don't need 
FT4, what's the point of FT4?  From reading posts, it seems that some of the 
slow rates were attributed to dividing the contest up between 2 incompatible 
modes.

Would it make more since to just use FT8 and make sure the exchange is FT8 
compatible?

Just asking.

Another observation from the postings - while FT8 may be taking over much of 
the DXing activity, it doesn't seem to be any threat to the Contest activity.  
It's a new interesting mode to try.  And we will see if it sustains good 
activity as it has time to develop.

73

Ed  BV/N1UR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>