WPX US Prefixes
Looking logs US station 2018 entries:
There were 1393 unique prefixes
254 of 1393 had only one callsign with that prefix entering
Twenty most common:
K4 41
W4 30
K6 29
K2 27
W6 25
W7 25
N2 24
K7 23
K9 23
N4 23
N6 23
K3 21
N3 21
W8 21
K5 20
W0 20
N1 19
N7 19
N9 19
W3 18
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 8:21 AM <cq-contest-request@contesting.com> wrote:
> Send CQ-Contest mailing list submissions to
> cq-contest@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cq-contest-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cq-contest-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CQ-Contest digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Heil Headphone Pads (Stanley Zawrotny)
> 2. Re: Sad prop forecast for the next few years (robert)
> 3. Re: Sad prop forecast for the next few years (Barry)
> 4. WPX SSB (Joe)
> 5. Re: Sad prop forecast for the next few years (Steve London)
> 6. Re: WPX SSB (Bob Shohet, KQ2M)
> 7. Re: WPX SSB (John Geiger)
> 8. Re: WPX SSB (Edward Sawyer)
> 9. Re: WPX SSB (Tom Haavisto)
> 10. Re: Sad prop forecast for the next few years (Mark - N5OT)
> 11. Re: WPX SSB (Dave Edmonds)
> 12. Re: Sad prop forecast for the next few years (Jeff Clarke)
> 13. Sad prop forecast for the next few years (Vytenis Sciucka)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 10:12:59 -0400
> From: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Heil Headphone Pads
> Message-ID: <97E29D4D-6D9F-456D-B0A1-31B6D5AD9065@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Yes,
>
> I bought RadioSport headphones to replace my uncomfortable Heils.
>
> Stan, K4SBZ
>
> "Real radio bounces off the sky."
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 09:28:15 -0500
> From: robert <wa1fcn@charter.net>
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years
> Message-ID: <2eec750d-e306-72f5-fca1-bca66240f86d@charter.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>
> ??? GM Bill
>
> ??? ??? I hope we do not have 3 more years of no sunspots!
>
> ??? ??? ??? 73 BoB WA1FCN
>
> On 3/22/2019 8:28 PM, Bill via CQ-Contest wrote:
> > Looks grim. How to keep the fun going?
> >
> > CQWW:
> > Time to let the member states of the USA work each other for points
> >
> > just like the member states of the EU now work each other for points.
> >
> > WPX:
> > 1 point for each Q X WPX mults
> >
> >
> > There won't be much left of the contesting hoi poi after 3 more years
> > of no sunspots
> >
> > 73, Bill KO7SS in Arizona
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 09:32:27 -0600
> From: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years
> Message-ID: <e9c5e0fb-c0c8-1479-0c23-8736be6d1e4c@comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> And I haven't turned my radio on in the last year except for CQWW and
> ARRL DX CW contests...
>
> Barry W2UP
>
> On 3/23/2019 7:47 AM, Bj?rn Ekelund wrote:
> > Could not agree more. I've worked almost 260 DXCC and
> > 1500 Challenge Points with 500W and a dipole since I returned
> > to ham radio less than three years ago.
> >
> > The trick is to simply ignore the spot count.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Bj?rn SM7IUN
> >
> >
> >
> > Den l?r 23 mars 2019 kl 14:31 skrev Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> The sky is not falling. I am still working stuff on 10 meters. The low
> >> bands are good. Maybe people will get on 6 meters where there is a
> >> surprising amount of DX.
> >>
> >> Chuck W5PR
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:58 PM Bill via CQ-Contest <
> >> cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Looks grim. How to keep the fun going?
> >>>
> >>> CQWW:
> >>> Time to let the member states of the USA work each other for points
> >>>
> >>> just like the member states of the EU now work each other for points.
> >>>
> >>> WPX:
> >>> 1 point for each Q X WPX mults
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> There won't be much left of the contesting hoi poi after 3 more years
> >>> of no sunspots
> >>>
> >>> 73, Bill KO7SS in Arizona
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 10:45:29 -0500
> From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
> To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB
> Message-ID: <afe212cf-8334-2305-0cb7-4ed64861df6d@mwt.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
> With this coming up soon,
>
> Has anyone digested recent years to see what are the rare prefixes ( for
> stateside stations )
>
> Joe WB9SBD
> --
> Sig
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 13:06:24 -0600
> From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years
> Message-ID: <9d44db89-615f-9ed5-4cac-a22e130c83ee@arrl.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> Bill,
>
> You have made other statements about the demise of contesting. It's not
> happening.
>
> For example, 2900 QSO's from New Mexico in ARRL DX CW a few weekends ago.
> No
> sunspots. Great fun.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
>
> >> Den l?r 23 mars 2019 kl 14:31 skrev Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> The sky is not falling. I am still working stuff on 10 meters. The low
> >>> bands are good. Maybe people will get on 6 meters where there is a
> >>> surprising amount of DX.
> >>>
> >>> Chuck W5PR
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:58 PM Bill via CQ-Contest <
> >>> cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Looks grim. How to keep the fun going?
> >>>>
> >>>> CQWW:
> >>>> Time to let the member states of the USA work each other for points
> >>>>
> >>>> just like the member states of the EU now work each other for points.
> >>>>
> >>>> WPX:
> >>>> 1 point for each Q X WPX mults
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> There won't be much left of the contesting hoi poi after 3 more years
> >>>> of no sunspots
> >>>>
> >>>> 73, Bill KO7SS in Arizona
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 16:54:19 -0400
> From: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>, "Joe" <nss@mwt.net>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB
> Message-ID: <C8450615F15A40E0813D76DFD5EDEFFD@BOBWINPC1PC>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Any prefix that you don?t already have. :-) With about 1,000
> potential US prefixes already licensed but so many of them inactive in
> contests, hundreds of them could be considered fairly ?rare?.
>
> 73
>
> Bob KQ2M
>
>
> From: Joe
> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 11:45 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB
>
> With this coming up soon,
>
> Has anyone digested recent years to see what are the rare prefixes ( for
> stateside stations )
>
> Joe WB9SBD
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 17:29:47 -0500
> From: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
> To: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>
> Cc: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>, Joe <nss@mwt.net>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAHC1P28m+6q5gyG38D9c1RDMHuq0b9gufwxtzWSF374X+XwbxQ@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> You could do a ULS license search on the FCC website where you just type in
> each prefix, and see how many licenses have been issued for that prefix.
> There are some Alaska prefixes which have never been issued. WL3 used to
> be one.
>
> You could also check the past contest results for the WPX contests to see
> what prefixes were entered in each contest.
>
> 73 John AF5CC
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 5:20 PM Bob Shohet, KQ2M <kq2m@kq2m.com> wrote:
>
> > Any prefix that you don?t already have. :-) With about 1,000
> > potential US prefixes already licensed but so many of them inactive in
> > contests, hundreds of them could be considered fairly ?rare?.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > Bob KQ2M
> >
> >
> > From: Joe
> > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 11:45 AM
> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB
> >
> > With this coming up soon,
> >
> > Has anyone digested recent years to see what are the rare prefixes ( for
> > stateside stations )
> >
> > Joe WB9SBD
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 20:39:27 -0400
> From: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
> To: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com"
> <cq-contest@contesting.com>, Joe <nss@mwt.net>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB
> Message-ID:
> <
> 0D39B6681B67B44DAEC5D6AD99294A8E047D03869CE5@SBEMAIL.sbelectronics.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> All you have to do is plug in a prefix into your contest software and see
> if it exist on SCP. If not, its super rare. If it only exists once on the
> database, its pretty unusual but exists.
>
> Ed N1UR - AC1U.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Bob Shohet, KQ2M
> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 4:54 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com; Joe
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB
>
> Any prefix that you don?t already have. :-) With about 1,000
> potential US prefixes already licensed but so many of them inactive in
> contests, hundreds of them could be considered fairly ?rare?.
>
> 73
>
> Bob KQ2M
>
>
> From: Joe
> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 11:45 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB
>
> With this coming up soon,
>
> Has anyone digested recent years to see what are the rare prefixes ( for
> stateside stations )
>
> Joe WB9SBD
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 21:32:46 -0400
> From: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
> To: Joe <nss@mwt.net>, CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAKNnRU7mTXmDewBy-C+_v0hTUDQm+B1AA07nycbu-k8PxYx0NQ@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> I think you are looking at this the wrong way. You are thinking "rare", as
> in a rare entity in a DX contest, and folks will chase it to add to their
> mult count.
> With so many mults available in the WPX contest, look at a few of the top
> scores (any year). You will see that every 3 to 5 QSOs is a new mult.
> This matches my experience. Even towards the end of the contest, when I am
> running, every 3 to 5 QSO's is a new mult. Even if you use a never before
> activated prefix, it will not generate a lot of extra interest, as there is
> simply SO many mults available. If you miss this one, you will work a new
> mult in the next few Q's you make, so no point in chasing a "rare" mult..
>
> Tom - VE3CX
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:46 PM Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:
>
> > With this coming up soon,
> >
> > Has anyone digested recent years to see what are the rare prefixes ( for
> > stateside stations )
> >
> > Joe WB9SBD
> > --
> > Sig
> > The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> > Idle Tyme
> > Idle-Tyme.com
> > http://www.idle-tyme.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 20:59:43 -0500
> From: Mark - N5OT <r-emails@n5ot.com>
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years
> Message-ID: <50166da7-a05b-6ba3-16b4-d373dca34d38@n5ot.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> Agreed,
>
> I am having more fun contesting now than ever.
>
> 73 - Mark N5OT
>
>
> On 3/23/2019 2:06 PM, Steve London wrote:
> > Bill,
> >
> > You have made other statements about the demise of contesting. It's
> > not happening.
> >
> > For example, 2900 QSO's from New Mexico in ARRL DX CW a few weekends
> > ago. No sunspots. Great fun.
> >
> > 73,
> > Steve, N2IC
> >
> >
> >>> Den l?r 23 mars 2019 kl 14:31 skrev Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> The sky is not falling. I am still working stuff on 10 meters. The low
> >>>> bands are good. Maybe people will get on 6 meters where there is a
> >>>> surprising amount of DX.
> >>>>
> >>>> Chuck W5PR
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:58 PM Bill via CQ-Contest <
> >>>> cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Looks grim. How to keep the fun going?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> CQWW:
> >>>>> Time to let the member states of the USA work each other for points
> >>>>>
> >>>>> just like the member states of the EU now work each other for points.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> WPX:
> >>>>> 1 point for each Q X WPX mults
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There won't be much left of the contesting hoi poi after 3 more years
> >>>>> of no sunspots
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 73, Bill KO7SS in Arizona
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 23:03:00 -0400
> From: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
> To: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
> Cc: Joe <nss@mwt.net>, CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB
> Message-ID:
> <CAHQrxhKPkGadSds2zmOz=
> qPYqvGZqn22be70PQYZkbN7YkLeAw@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> I typically have pretty devent 'runs' in the CQWPX even with my very low
> 80/40/20 pinwheel antennas running barefoot....
>
> 73s Dave WN4AFP
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:48 PM Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think you are looking at this the wrong way. You are thinking "rare",
> as
> > in a rare entity in a DX contest, and folks will chase it to add to their
> > mult count.
> > With so many mults available in the WPX contest, look at a few of the top
> > scores (any year). You will see that every 3 to 5 QSOs is a new mult.
> > This matches my experience. Even towards the end of the contest, when I
> am
> > running, every 3 to 5 QSO's is a new mult. Even if you use a never
> before
> > activated prefix, it will not generate a lot of extra interest, as there
> is
> > simply SO many mults available. If you miss this one, you will work a
> new
> > mult in the next few Q's you make, so no point in chasing a "rare" mult..
> >
> > Tom - VE3CX
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:46 PM Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:
> >
> > > With this coming up soon,
> > >
> > > Has anyone digested recent years to see what are the rare prefixes (
> for
> > > stateside stations )
> > >
> > > Joe WB9SBD
> > > --
> > > Sig
> > > The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> > > Idle Tyme
> > > Idle-Tyme.com
> > > http://www.idle-tyme.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
> --
> Dave Edmonds
> PK Ministry Webs
> 864.288.6678
> dave@pkministrywebs.com
> www.pkministrywebs.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 00:49:09 -0400
> From: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years
> Message-ID: <0a7bfd7c-91f1-2555-b3af-da2a07b597cc@ku8e.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> Time to book a trip to the Caribbean :) It's always good there!
>
> Jeff KU8E
>
> On 3/23/2019 09:59 PM, Mark - N5OT wrote:
> > Agreed,
> >
> > I am having more fun contesting now than ever.
> >
> > 73 - Mark N5OT
> >
> >
> > On 3/23/2019 2:06 PM, Steve London wrote:
> >> Bill,
> >>
> >> You have made other statements about the demise of contesting. It's
> >> not happening.
> >>
> >> For example, 2900 QSO's from New Mexico in ARRL DX CW a few weekends
> >> ago. No sunspots. Great fun.
> >>
> >> 73,
> >> Steve, N2IC
> >>
> >>
> >>>> Den l?r 23 mars 2019 kl 14:31 skrev Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com
> >:
> >>>>
> >>>>> The sky is not falling. I am still working stuff on 10 meters. The
> >>>>> low
> >>>>> bands are good. Maybe people will get on 6 meters where there is a
> >>>>> surprising amount of DX.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Chuck W5PR
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:58 PM Bill via CQ-Contest <
> >>>>> cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Looks grim. How to keep the fun going?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> CQWW:
> >>>>>> Time to let the member states of the USA work each other for points
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> just like the member states of the EU now work each other for
> >>>>>> points.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> WPX:
> >>>>>> 1 point for each Q X WPX mults
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There won't be much left of the contesting hoi poi after 3 more
> >>>>>> years
> >>>>>> of no sunspots
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 73, Bill KO7SS in Arizona
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> --
> *Jeff Clarke*
> Information Technology Professional
> Ellerslie, Georgia
>
> KU8E.com <http://www.ku8e.com/>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:38:30 +0200
> From: Vytenis Sciucka <vytenis.sciucka@gmail.com>
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years
> Message-ID:
> <CAMY=
> m21zjxnKOaQ8fZEkmNZhjC+6FYXXU6mRTR3qsWnMNbUpRQ@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Predicted values are based on the consensus of the Solar Cycle 24
> Prediction Panel
>
> I feel that this prediction was made with focus on Cycle 24.
> For cycle 25 there are other predictions which are more or less better:
> One of the gurus in solarcycle predictions David Hathaway said:
>
> *We predict that SC25 will be about slightly smaller (?95%) the strength of
> SC24, making it the weakest solar cycle in the last hundred years. We also
> predict that,like SC24, SC25 will be preceded by a long extended solar
> minimum. *
> Full text is not available, but abstrtact is
> https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2018GL078387
> Another guru Leif Svalgaard says:
>
>
> *SC25 will be somewhere between SC24 and SC20, provided the lPolar Field
> Precursor Relationship holds*
>
> SSN(24)=116; SSN(20)=152. You can find his prognosis at the end of this 18
> page long text https://www.leif.org/research/Prediction-of-SC25.pdf
> And third prognosis is made by not known to me indian scientists Dibyendu
> Nandi and Prantika Bhowmik http://www.cessi.in/solarcycle25prediction/
> it
> also does not sound very bad.
>
>
> Vytenis LY5T
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 195, Issue 36
> *******************************************
>
--
*Anthony Luscre*
*K8ZT*
Assistant Ohio Section Manager for Education Outreach
ARRL - The National Association For Amateur Radio™
a@k8zt.com (best for Education & Technology)
k8zt@arrl.net (best for Amateur Radio)
*The Web Resource Hoarder- www.ZTLearn.com <http://www.ztlearn.com/>*
*Web Resource Hoarder Blog*
*K8ZT Radio Website- www.k8zt.com <http://www.k8zt.com/>*
*My Radio Blog- k8zt.blogspot.com <http://k8zt.blogspot.com/>*
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|