I'm bringing this up at the ARRL programs and services committee
meeting this Thursday. I do think it should be apportioned. I've also
let Zev, N2WKS (CAC rep) aware of it so he can discuss it in their
meetings and they can make a recommendation.
Stay tuned...
73
Ria, N2RJ
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 13:34, N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Last weekend, W1LWH and I operated a "classic" multi-single in the CW
> contest. He's a member of YCCC and I am a member of PVRC. In doing
> paperwork after the contest, I was surprised to discover that the
> contest rules require multi-ops' score credit only be given to one
> affiliated club. Since PVRC is less serious about ARRL DX than YCCC, we
> decided to give the credit to that club.
>
> My question is, why is this necessary? Wouldn't a rule like CQWW's be
> better suited to our mobile society? Is this just an anachronism?
>
> --
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
> at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
> spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
> For spots, please use your favorite
> "retail" DX cluster.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|