To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Summary of Software and Transceivers used by WRTC teams |
From: | Pat N8VW <n8vw@linuxcolumbus.com> |
Date: | Tue, 07 Aug 2018 20:53:55 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 2018-08-07 11:57, Jim Brown wrote: There are other factors. A competitor friend (who placed in the top third of the pack) told me yesterday that the top scoring team, from Lithuania, had something like 250 unique LY QSOs in their log that were not penalized, and that removing those Qs would have greatly reduced their lead over second and third place. He said they also had QSOs removed for exchange errors that were clearly copied and logged correctly based on their recording. I count 76 unique LY callsigns in the Y81N log, not 250. Pat N8VW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] It's time for an Assisted category in NAQP, K8MR via CQ-Contest |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] It's time for an Assisted category in NAQP, Jeff Clarke |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Summary of Software and Transceivers used by WRTC teams, Barry |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Summary of Software and Transceivers used by WRTC teams, Roger Parsons via CQ-Contest |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |