My point, exactly!
73,
Scott K9MA
On 11/28/2017 21:33, Adam Mercier wrote:
Thank you, Scott. I’m not a CW contester (I prefer phone and RTTY contests) mostly because I have a 15 wpm ear, and my decoding
software doesn’t do well on 30+ wpm. I decided to give this contest a try because I was lured in by the idea of logging new DXCCs (I
got one new one with PS0F) on CW. My rate was horrible because I had to listen to stations multiple passes to make sure I got their call and
exchange right before I’d call them. There were so many that were loud, but blazing fast—so much so that I couldn’t make
heads or tails of it, so I just spun the dial. That’s a missed Q for both of us. I wonder how many points were left on the table by
those stations because us “casual contesters” just moved along? Perhaps it wasn’t a significant amount, but I believe
that contests thrive when casual contesters and passers-by jump into the mix. Otherwise all the powerhouses would have all worked each other
in the first 12 hours of the contest, and would then have nobody left to log....so, why not facilitate those Qs and QRS when you hear someone
call you at 15 or 20 wpm? Just my neophyte thought....
Adam, KM7N
On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:10, K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us> wrote:
I completely fail to understand why so many operators insist on calling CQ at
45 wpm, when no one is coming back. (There were lots of them last weekend,
especially from zone 33.) This seem entirely counterproductive. Not only does
it discourage operators who aren't comfortable at that speed, but it also makes
the call impossible to copy under some conditions for even the best operators.
Isn't a slow QSO better than no QSO?
73,
Scott K9MA
On 11/28/2017 10:10, Ria Jairam wrote:
I received comments from some of my friends that they didn't want to
wade in because it would be like driving a unicycle on an interstate.
There were some doing 40-50WPM... not that there is anything wrong
with speed, but sometimes who want to casually participate and "give
out points" get scared away.
I did a steady 30WPM and QRS as necessary.
Something to keep in mind.
That said I worked several straight keys, tons of bugs, and a good bit
of QLF. All in the fun.
73
Ria, N2RJ
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com> wrote:
You have slow CW? My solution:
K3 set at 400 bandwidth. P3 panadapter and large monitor. Start at bottom
of band and tune center of slim visual pip. K3, spots, and your head
confirm callers' letters.
Push programmed send..... send your call sign.
Learned my own call at high speed, so I read mine.
Read screen to confirm his info, even with cut numbers, including an E for
5 in 5NN, moan.
Push button to send ur info.
Log 'em.
Tune 500cycles up and work next loud sig.
A killer solution to slow copying speed. S&P produces about 1 to 2 per
minute, so dive in and enjoy 30+ wpm!
73,
Charly, HS0ZCW
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
Scott K9MA
k9ma@sdellington.us
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
Scott K9MA
k9ma@sdellington.us
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|