I can see both sides of this argument. While it seems dirty to use data
collected by others, many do this with Super Check partial right? Many
countries publish callsign data so that makes it different.
Who is using the SS data? Is it your top 10 contenders or is it people
just trying to have fun that may not copy code all that well that want a
bit of a crutch? Does it matter?
If you want to change your check than I am all for it. This probably
does not affect the serious competitors in the standings and the
participants probably don't care about busts anyway. I see tons of bust
even recently where people think I am still in a state where I am not
and have not operated SS from in years.
Just operate and have fun!
W0MU
On 10/20/2017 9:41 AM, Ria Jairam wrote:
Then so be it. If they want to not risk busted QSOs they'll copy
what's sent and not rely on what's in the database. I am not even sure
what year I was licensed.
The "on their toes" part was a joke, but it's clear that some hams
have no sense of humor.
Safest way is to listen, copy and strive to be accurate, and realize
that there is risk in using a database. If you train yourself to do
that, there's much less risk of busted QSOs.
73
Ria, N2RJ
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Ted Bryant <w4nz@comcast.net> wrote:
"... I routinely "update" my exchange from the last contest, just to confound those who use
"pre-loaded" data file crutches ..."
"... I’ve been meaning to change things up anyway, just to keep them on their
toes..."
These practices were part of a discussion at Contest University in Dayton a few
years ago. IIRC, this raised a question of ethics when the purpose was as
stated above.
In any case, be aware that you are setting yourself up for a lot of fill requests from
operators who are "on their toes" to confirm what they're hearing that's at
odds with the call history info.
Ted W4NZ
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ria
Jairam
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 5:14 PM
To: Art Boyars; CQ-Contest Reflector
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] "It's just to save on typing"
I’ve been meaning to change things up anyway, just to keep them on their toes.
73
Ria, N2RJ
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:31 PM Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com> wrote:
When I saw the post about Call History Files for SS, and then saw the
post for the site where you can get them, I was tempted to put in some
bogus data -- change CK 60 to CK 69; change name Art to name Ari. But
I'm not quite that cranky. Yet.
73, Art K3KU
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:
Where possible, I routinely "update" my exchange from the last
contest, just to confound those who use "pre-loaded" data file crutches.
73, de Hans, K0HB
-----Original Message----- From: Art Boyars
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 9:01 PM
To: CQ-Contest Reflector
Subject: [CQ-Contest] "It's just to save on typing"
E-mail chatting with N4ZR, who has relocated from WV to MD. Pete
muses that a lot of people who rely on SCP or Call History (or
whatever it is) "to save on typing" will bust the QSO by logging him as WV.
I can see it now -- a cry for making the data files official;
perhaps prohibiting people from relocating or using a different name.
"All participants must register in the official Call History File.
Your log must contain the data as reported in that File. Scoring
will be in accordance with that File."
Just think of all the typing we'll save!
73, Art K3KU
who hopes you took this in fun (sort of)
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|