>Would be interesting to get N1MM, DXlog and other guys opinions...
Victor
The response provided earlier is the opinion of the N1MM Development Team. We
do not intend to send simultaneous scoreboard reports to multiple servers, nor
do we intend to support different protocols for every scoreboard server that
appears on the Internet.
We expect the scoreboard developers to interoperate among themselves to deliver
complete contest scores from any site – just like the packet spot network
presents a complete picture from any packet host. Please don’t create a
fractured contest reporting service by making your customers decide which site
to use for which contest (because they might not choose yours).
-larry (K8UT)
-----Original Message-----
From: Victor Androsov
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 10:29 AM
To: Wayne, W5XD
Cc: cq-contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Online Scoreboards
Hi Wayne,
Thanks for the idea. But I guess in this case voting wouldn't make any
sense. No one except logger developers knows what does that mean to develop
some additional feature for a logger. No one knows except online board
server script developers what does that mean to develop cross servers score
exchange API and what kind of impact on the server performance that would
produce.
I would like to say we are trying to discuss that option. But it's too
early to say something.
Anyway that's always good to have different options ready to go. BTW I was
watching how N3FJP logger clients have been visible on both score boards
during the last CQ WW RTTY. That dual-board option was working flawlessly
for them. Would be interesting to get N1MM, DXlog and other guys opinions
about that dual (or multiple) score board feature.
73!
Victor
VA2WA
https://contestonlinescore.com
On 22 September 2017 at 15:59, Wayne, W5XD <w5xd@writelog.com> wrote:
> Victor,
> I am not so sure. Maybe we can all vote on this: Which of these, using
> your word, is "easier"?
> a) 3 scoreboarding websites share scores
> b) every single contester accommodate scoreboards that don't.
> Wayne, W5XD
>
> > Larry,
> >
> > You made a very good point. But for now it's the easiest solution.
> Linking
> > together all the scoreboards would take time since it's a real technical
> > challenge. As I know there are just 3 active boards today. Just checking
> by
> > all the 3 in your logger settings would make it done for all. And of
> course
> > anyone can choose whatever he or she wants ))
> >
> > 73!
> >
> > Victor
> > VA2WA
> >
> > https://contestonlinescore.com/
> >
> > On 21 September 2017 at 15:36, Larry Gauthier (K8UT) <K8UT@charter.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >/>> can upload real score to all the three real score sites/
> > >/>>simultaneously. Just amazing! We are waiting when/
> > >/>>other "big" loggers to take this option on board/
> > >
> > >/Really, Victor? Do you think this is the right architecture? Requiring/
> > >/every logging program and every station to identify which online
> > scoreboard/
> > >/to use for which contest?/
> > >
> > >/Frankly, we're waiting until the online scoreboards exchange scores
> among/
> > >/themselves so that every contest station doesn't have to worry about
> > where/
> > >/scores are collected./
> > >
> > >/-larry (K8UT)/
> > >/-----Original Message-----/
> > >/From: Victor Androsov/
> > >/Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 11:26 AM/
> > >/To: cq-contest/
> > >/Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Online Scoreboards/
> > >
> > >/Hi all,/
> > >
> > >/Coming back to a new season we have few news about real scoring:/
> > >
> > >/- One new logger just started supporting online scoring - N3FJP. We
> like/
> > >/that it has a possibility to post data to contestonlineboard.com,/
> > >/cqcontest.net and one more easily configured by user third party site.
> > The/
> > >/logger can upload real score to all the three real score sites/
> > >/simultaneously. Just amazing! We are waiting when other "big" loggers
> to/
> > >/take this option on board ))/
> > >
> > >/- The https://contestonlinescore.com/ server has announced a new
> option -/
> > >/INSTANT RATE GRAPHS. Here is the screenshot from the latest CWT mini
> > test:/
> > >/https://contestonlinescore.com/rates.png . That's a true instant
> > analyzing/
> > >/feature providing 10 minutes rate for min tests running 1 hour or less
> > or 1/
> > >/hour rate for all other longer contests. It starts working since the
> > first/
> > >/minute and available for logged in users just by clicking on a
> > competitor's/
> > >/call on the board. It's a new feature and we would be appreciated for
> all/
> > >/the feedbacks and suggestions on improving it./
> > >
> > >/- The next weekend we are serving the following contests:/
> > >
> > >/CQ WW RTTY/
> > >/Maine QSO Party/
> > >/Texas QSO Party/
> > >
> > >/73!/
> > >
> > >/Victor/
> > >/VA2WA/
> > >
> > >/https://contestonlinescore.com//
> > >/_______________________________________________/
> > >/CQ-Contest mailing list/
> > >/CQ-Contest@contesting.com/
> > >/http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest/
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|
