CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?

To: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?
From: "AA6DX - Mark" <aa6dx@arrl.net>
Reply-to: AA6DX - Mark <aa6dx@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 12:55:48 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I completely agree with Mike -- UNASSISTED means just that -- The two are not the same, no matter what the computer folk say -- and I have worked (B4 retirement & stroke) on computers over 25 years)
Mark  AA6DX

-----Original Message-----&
From: Mike Smith VE9AA
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 7:30 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?

I don't wish for my UNassisted score to be combined with others to choose to
go assisted.

Both are completely separate categories and should not be combined,
regardless of what the final tally is.

I could care less what someone got for a final score using the assisted
category. It has zero bearing in comparison

to what I do when I choose to go "UN".



To combine them is to water down the results and usher in the demise of the
CQWW's as we know it.



Mike VE9AA



Mike, Coreen & Corey

Keswick Ridge, NB



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>