To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? |
From: | K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us> |
Date: | Sun, 30 Jul 2017 10:10:48 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I know it's not always true, but I just assume the guest ops are getting
some support from their hosts, so I just ignore their scores when
comparing to my own. (Not that I'm ever in contention for a top spot,
anyway.) I also ignore the scores of those I know just hired someone to
build their antenna systems. While I don't think any rule changes are
necessary, those folks aren't in my category. There are plenty of
top-scoring operators who ARE!
73, Scott K9MA -- Scott K9MA k9ma@sdellington.us _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?, Ed Sawyer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?, Yuri |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?, Ed Sawyer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?, Yuri |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |