CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] I hate ITU Prefills

To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] I hate ITU Prefills
From: Mike Hance <5mxmike@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:14:05 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
How ironic, TR software maximized the ability to use these type of files!
 :)

k5nz



It's still a depressing feeling for me seeing all of this activity around
getting the ITU pre-fill database updated every year.  Does this activity
stop after the contest?  I am sure there is enough momentum of the
collusion that goes on - that some people think nothing of helping their
friend out when they are sure if MRASZ was right or not.

One of the things we try to measure during a contest is how accurate people
are.  How well they can copy what they hear in the headphones and
accurately log it.  This is a skill that would be very important if the
amateur radio service is ever called into handling emergency
communications.

In an emergency - we don't have pre fills on the information we might be
exchanging.  A phone number needs to be copied correctly in order to find
the right person on the other end.  (This is something I was personally
involved in after the 1971 San Fernando Earthquake).

As the log checker for the IARU contest - it is fairly easy for me to bust
exchanges for people who mis-copied the ITU designator.  However, a group
of you have decided this is too much work during the contest and want to
rely on a pre fill database instead of using your brain to figure out what
is being sent.  This feels like you are playing the game by a different set
of rules.

I applaud those who avoid using such a database.  In truth - by keeping
their brain engaged - they might actually have a more accurate log.

Tree N6TR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>