CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Attention CQWW SO2R Competitors

To: matt@nq6n.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Attention CQWW SO2R Competitors
From: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:54:56 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
By no means whatsoever do I now or ever condone cheating.


My concern is that is the zeal to catch cheaters, I have to wonder if the cure 
is worse than the disease?  If you chase out the honest folks who simply don't 
wish to put up with the more draconian and invasive methods... and the cheaters 
will still try to cheat... what have you accomplished?



73, ron W3WN





-----Original Message-----
From: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
To: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Cc: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>; cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, Jun 29, 2017 11:47 am
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Attention CQWW SO2R Competitors




> I sure hope he is, but I suspect that he is not.


> You are joking - right??  73






My intention was just to point out that even with extreme measures cheating 
would still be easy to do.  I think the contest organizers should be very clear 
about exactly the kind of cheating strategies that additional "audit trail" 
requirements are meant to prevent. 


73,
Matt NQ6N











_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>