CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Control Operators and Contesting

To: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Control Operators and Contesting
From: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:20:31 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
A repeater ID is one of the exceptions. I have been in repeater "wars" and
it can get nasty. I hope "I'm sorry, Won't do it again" was a sufficient
response. --73, Mike, WV2ZOW

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:

> I was trustee of a club 2-meter repeater.  A--hole in another club didn't
> like us.  Narc'ed to local FCC guy.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:11 Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Wow! Curious as to the circumstances under which you were caught.  97.119
>> b 1 only applies  "When keyed by an automatic device used only for
>> identification, the speed must not exceed 20 words per minute" (highlight
>> mine) which pretty much does not include any way we normally use CW.
>> --Mike, WV2ZOW
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> No, but I once was caught exceeding the CW speed limit and was cited
>>> under
>>>
>> *§97.119(b)(1).*
>>>
>>> *Honest Injun!*
>>>
>>> *73, de Hans, K0HB*
>>> *AKA: Speed demon*
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 20:05 <w5ov@w5ov.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Has anyone ever been cited for violation of 97.119d ?
>>> >
>>> > 73,
>>> >
>>> > Bob W5OV
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, June 21, 2017 2:37 pm, Ria Jairam wrote:
>>> > > On Phone "This is N2RJ operating W5T" is what I usually do.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Or on CW -  DE W5T OP N2RJ
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Never really had confusion, in the times I operated a special event.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Even if the callers aren't aware of the rules, I'm sure at least some
>>> > > wanted to know who was behind the mic/key.
>>> > >
>>> > > Ria
>>> > > N2RJ
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:28 PM <john@kk9a.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >> That might not be a good plan, a station signing with multiple
>>> > >> callsigns would cause confusion for those working him. I am sure
>>> that
>>> > >> many hams are not aware of the special event ID requirements in
>>> > >> 97.119(d).
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> John KK9A
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> To:     Thomas Schaefer <toms@xmission.com>,
>>> cq-contest@contesting.com
>>> > >> Subject:        Re: [CQ-Contest] Control Operators and Contesting
>>> > >> From:   Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
>>> > >> Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:00:48 +0000
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Whenever I operate a 1x1 I always ID with my own call every 30
>>> minutes
>>> > >> at least. Usually every 10 out of habit.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Ria
>>> > >> N2RJ
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> _______________________________________________
>>> > >> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> > >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> > >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> > > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>> >
>>> --
>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>> --
>>> "Just a boy and his radio"™
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>> --
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> --
> "Just a boy and his radio"™
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>