That's why, IMHO, there SHOULD be a penalty when the other operator busts your
call.
73,
Scott K9MA
----------
Scott Ellington
--- via iPad
> On Jun 15, 2017, at 7:44 AM, Nick Lekic <nick.ve3ey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Let's keep the government regulators out of contesting please :-)
>
> If a station chooses to send his or her call at 50 wpm or ID once per hour
> it's their own strategy. They do whatever they think it works best for them
> - not for you. It may help them or hurt them - whatever - but at the end
> it's their call.
>
> Nick
> VE3EY
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>>> On Jun 15, 2017, at 3:30 AM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed,6/14/2017 5:39 PM, K9MA wrote:
>>> Maybe 6Y2T could QRS just a tiny bit?
>>
>> YES! Garry, NI6T, has allowed our CQP group to use his call several times.
>> We don't send his call at the speed of light. Our club call is W6BX. I
>> insert half spaces in both calls to make it easier to copy. W6JTI mostly
>> works QRP and mostly CW. He carefully inserts half-spaces in his F-key
>> messages. I watched him do it setting up for our team expedition to CM79 for
>> ARRL VHF. GOOD ops who aren't ego-centered do stuff like that.
>>
>> A common mistake that EU stations make in DX contests is to bang away at 35+
>> WPM when conditions are causing lots of flutter over a path. Why is it that
>> these guys think that THEIR signal doesn't have the same flutter at my QTH
>> that mine does at theirs? Did these guys sleep through the fundamental
>> principle of reciprocity?
>>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|