CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 160M LCR Report

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 160M LCR Report
From: "Wayne, W5XD" <w5xd@writelog.com>
Reply-to: w5xd@writelog.com
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 06:12:23 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
That software fix is our last hope--Obi-Wan
No. There is another.--Yoda

The other hope is that you could remind your little pistol friends to
submit their logs. This might even be especially true of one-QSO logs
and friends we have known since they were 8. Recall the  WRTC podium
finishers that were decided by such a little pistol and his missing log.

Yesterday I browsed the top of the recent ARRL DX CW 2017 results and
then clicked the link to the last page to confirm my own 8-QSO log was
there. It was not. That last results page is FULL of single-QSO submissions.

Wayne, W5XD

> I was looking over my Log Checking Report for the 2016 ARRL 160M Contest. I
> came across this line in the callsign check results:
>
> K5GA is incorrect.  Should be K5NA.
>
>
> I am a bit mystified by this since the report is saying that I didn't work
> K5GA, but instead actually worked myself (K5NA).
>
> In all probability, K5GA is a unique. I have known Billy since he was 8
> years old and it is likely that he got on and gave me a QSO. A few of the
> locals will do that, quite unsolicited.
>
> What is likely here is that we have uncovered a small problem in the log
> checking program. You should never be told that you got a call wrong and
> that you actually worked yourself.
>
> A single line of additional code can probably keep this from happening
> again. But it isn't really a big deal to me.
>
> 73, Richard - K5NA


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>