Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios

[Mike Kasrich <aj9c@indy.rr.com>]

I have a 6500 and placed a deposit on the 6600 because of the SO2R 
capability. Originally I had a 6300 and a K3 in shack so I could compare 
side by side. Both are good rigs to have. With the Flex I was able to 
remove interface devices like the microham from the set up. Less cabling 
is always better in my opinion.

Side by side during the ARRL 160 contest both rigs perform the same in 
opinion on rx. There were stations every 300Hz and as you moved from one 
to the next the previous station disappeared. At narrower bandwidths the 
Flex was easier to listen to. Having the panadapter included was nice. 
visually being able to see a hole in the band to start CQing is almost 
like cheating.

This is my opinion only YMMV but I switched and haven't looked back.


Mike/aj9c


On 5/22/2017 12:30 PM, Ria Jairam wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> The 6500 is a discontinued model. It is replaced by the 6600.
>
> The 6600 will do SO2R in a single box and has the new preselectors with
> 50dB of isolation between SCUs (an SCU is a flex term for a wideband
> receiver).
>
> As for comparing it to a K3S, that's a holy war you want to start here. :)
>   However on the Maestro or M series radios the display is larger, the knobs
> are larger (on Maestro) and it has the panadapter built in. But I think
> everything else is a matter of personal preference because the performance
> is so high between those radios that to the average operator with the
> average set of ears any difference is minor.
>
> 73
> Ria, N2RJ
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Bill via CQ-Contest <
> cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
>
> > At the hamfest last weekend I had some extra time Sunday and wandered over
> > to the Flex radio site. and had a long sit down with one of the reps.  I
> > did a hands on with the 6500  and was truly impressed, especially with how
> > "easy" it was on the ears.
> >
> > I currently have a pair of K-3s for SO2R and have kicked around replacing
> > these with the 6500.  I know K9CT as well as a couple others who use the
> > Flex stuff.  I really would like to hear from them and others about these
> > radios and how they compare to the K-3s in a contesting and Dxing
> > situation...ease of use, operator friendly, audio quality for listening as
> > well as transmit etc.  Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Bill K4XS/KH7XS
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest