To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band |
From: | Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:03:56 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Is there a 'compelling' reason NOT to? Maybe it is because some people CAN'T do it so they don't want ANYBODY to do it. 73 Tom W7WHY On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Dick Green WC1M <wc1m73@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Is there a compelling reason to allow Single Ops to do alternating CQs on > the same band? > > > > 73. Dick WC1M > > _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band, Richard F DiDonna NN3W |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band, Richard F DiDonna NN3W |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |