To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Are you a Clueless Cluster Clicker? |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
Date: | Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:50:11 -0800 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Tue,3/7/2017 11:37 AM, Mike Tessmer wrote: This past weekend I listened to an exasperated S54ZZ on 80m tell caller after caller "We've worked before, we've worked before" all because he was erroneously spotted as S51ZZ. He'd give his call....and the guys just kept calling. Some of this is also the fault of running stations who fail to identify regularly, and of calling ops who can't copy CW. :) One way to fix the former is to ID after every QSO. As in "TU K9YC" 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ, Jorge Diez - CX6VM |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Station design and ergonomics, Ria Jairam |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Are you a Clueless Cluster Clicker?, Tom Osborne |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Are you a Clueless Cluster Clicker?, steve . root |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |