CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK DQ

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK DQ
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 08:22:38 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Since they could not determine guilt, instead of a DQ they did the right thing, a checklog.

They did their job.

I don't see a huge line of people volunteering to help these people out. Just a bunch of Monday morning QB's making assumptions based on hearsay.

W0MU


On 3/6/2017 7:12 AM, James Cain wrote:
"Keeping suspicions private is a good thing. The more the CC reveals, the more info cheaters have to stay one step ahead and circumvent the ules." -- W2UP

Better to let nine guilty people go free than to execute one innocent person. -- K1TN

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>