That is exactly what I am saying.
It has the same effect in the same contest - the participant is removed
from the running.
It does not have the same effect in future endeavors - a DQ will disqualify
you from future contests (depending on the rules) and disqualify you for
WRTC.
Ria
N2RJ
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, Ria, as explained by another respondent, it is not the same "for all
> intents and purposes". A check log does not keep you from being a WRTC-2018
> competitor. A DQ DOES keep you from being a WRTC-2018 competitor.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
>
> On 03/04/2017 08:11 AM, Ria Jairam wrote:
>
>> Oh it's not really a difference.
>>
>> It's like asking someone for their resignation versus firing them. Same
>> thing happens - the person is gone. The only difference is one looks
>> better
>> on paper for future endeavors.
>>
>> So for all intents and purposes it's a DQ, just not in name. The CC is
>> being lenient. I'm sure they could DQ if they really wanted to. They've
>> done this for others.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ria
>> N2RJ
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 10:01 AM DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Rudy and group,
>>>
>>> Serious question...it has to do with terminolgy. Is this really a DQ?
>>> W4PA's message to CX2DK does not use the term DQ, but reclassification.
>>>
>>> As you wrote below, there was no violation, but a non-compliance
>>> situation.
>>>
>>> Not taking sides, but DQ seems to strong for what happened.
>>>
>>> 73 de Vince, VA3VF
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017-03-03 7:17 PM, Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not knowing the full details, however, it seems that the station has
>>>>
>>> been DQ'd solely due to the lack of audio recording. That is, no other
>>> rule
>>> violation or suspected violation was mentioned. So if indeed the log
>>> checker did not have any other concerns and the lack of recording was the
>>> only reason, the DQ seems a bit excessive.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rudy N2WQ
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|