CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Fwd: Re: TTT as an exchange

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Re: TTT as an exchange
From: BILL SHEEHAN <kb3lix@comcast.net>
Reply-to: BILL SHEEHAN <kb3lix@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:09:18 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm logging the TTT
That is what was sent, that is what I'm sticking with.


bill




> ---------- Original Message ----------
> From: "Alan M. Eshleman" <doctore@well.com>
> To: Mike Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net>
> Cc: Contest List <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Date: February 18, 2017 at 5:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TTT as an exchange
> 
> I'm logging it as what he sent.  He *meant* 1000, but to hell with it.  I'm 
> kinda tired of all those "cool" ways of sending power numbers.  I'm sure the 
> contest committee knows what's going on and won't ding us.  Copy what was 
> sent: the prime directive.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Alan/K6SRZ
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Ritz" <w7vo@comcast.net>
> To: "Contest List" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 11:19:42 AM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] TTT as an exchange
> 
> I worked a guy last night (V43Z) on a couple of bands that was giving out 
> "TTT" as a power level. I'm savy enough to know that this is "000", but do I 
> really log this as "000"? He is running NO power? 
> 
> 73; 
> Mike 
> W7VO 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>