CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing

To: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing
From: John Dorr via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: John Dorr <k1ar@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 20:05:03 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ok everyone -- it's time to move on with this thread. 

Feel free to discuss, oh I don't know, maybe something related to contesting.  
:-)

Thanks.

73, John, K1AR

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 4, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes. That's the 34 ¢ postcard rate as I mentioned. You do risk the
> machinery tearing up your card and barcodes are sprayed on it.
> 
> 73
> Ria, N2RJ
> 
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:47 PM, DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Again, just a guess...wasn't there a time when the US Postal Service had a
>> card only rate that was very cheap? That could have made the idea of a
>> domestic buro seem unnecessary at the time. It could be an idea worth
>> exploring now.
>> 
>> 73 de Vince, VA3VF
>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> But to us, that is like us having a Stateside Buro.
>>> I really wonder why one hasn't started for stateside stuff.
>>> 
>>> Joe WB9SBD
>>> Sig
>>> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
>>> Idle Tyme
>>> Idle-Tyme.com
>>> http://www.idle-tyme.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>