I've been contesting for 40+ years and I've never felt that sending
"test" at the end of a contest CQ has ever hurt my rate. Is it
absolutely necessary? No...but I do think that it helps to attract more
of the casual operators by making the intent of my transmission clear.
I've read the comments in this thread and while there are no shortage of
opinions, I saw no compelling arguments. Therefore I will continue to
format my contest CQs in a manner which my experience has shown results
in the best rate for me, not for some hotshot with an itchy F4 finger
who MIGHT happen to be tuning by.
The thing which drives me nuts are the lids that start sending their
call before I've finished sending. My xcvr switches back to receive and
the station calling me is already sending the second digit of his call.
This is not a CW VOX delay problem as my CW PTT is controlled by the
computer which releases simultaneously with the last CW element. (Yes,
I'm a retired engineer and wrote my own logging software so I KNOW
that's how it works.)
Scenario:
me: CQ TEST K8CC TEST
other: 2XYZ
me: 2XYZ?
other: 2XYZ
me: ?2XYZ
other: 2XYZ
me: 2XYZ NO QSK HR DAMMIT
other: N2XYZ
Disclaimer - the callsign N2XYZ is shown simply as an example. No doubt
the station was simply trying to get the QSO done quickly, but he's
killing his own rate. Doing it on the initial call might be a simple
timing mistake, but doing it over and over (I am not exaggerating about
this) shows a lack of situational awareness on the part of the other op.
Establishing and completing communication is at the core of contesting.
This requires more that just a fast keyer speed and transmitting without
a sense of timing...
FWIW...just my humble opinion.
Dave K8CC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|