CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] It's not the sunspots, folks

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] It's not the sunspots, folks
From: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:49:44 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Yeah, CQ WW SSB was tough. I was hoping to pick up Zone 2 on 160m, but I
heard none of the active stations - even when they were spotted.

Unfortunately the declining portion of a solar cycle (where we are)
historically has the most geomagnetic field activity due to coronal holes.
CMEs (the other trouble maker) are more likely at solar maximum.

Ed N1UR asked about cosmic rays affecting 75/80m and 40m. For all intents
and purposes on 160m and HF, ionospheric absorption is inversely
proportional to the square of the frequency. So when we double the
frequency from 160m to 75/80m, the ionospheric absorption decreases by one
fourth. It would decrease even more (by one sixteenth) on 40m.

So if cosmic rays are going to affect us, it will be on 160m.

Carl (not Karl) K9LA
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>