CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Its not the Sunspots folks

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Its not the Sunspots folks
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:30:32 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Agreed. There were plenty of zero pointers to work, who sat and called cq endlessly. Why does the USA always get "punished"? There are lots more hams in EU now then ever. The scores show that it was a pretty good contest over there.

W0MU


On 10/31/2016 4:10 PM, Jeff Clarke wrote:

After the terrible conditions in CQWW DX SSB this weekend allowing USA-USA QSO's for 1 point looks to be an attractive option. Why is it this is allowed for EU stations and VE's working the USA making it basically a domestic like contest for them? Plus it's the same for those stations in North Africa. (CN/CT islands/EA islands) It at least makes the contest fun and interesting for them while the rest of us suffer thru bad propagation. Of course the contesting purists out there will veto this idea in a millisecond. :)

The saving grace for me is I will be in PJ4 for CQWW DX CW and look forward to having you as a captive audience !

Jeff / KU8E




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>