I don't see the point of this at all. What possible benefit is there
for anyone ... even those who own 200 watt rigs ... to make this change??
From a competitive standpoint, those who own 100 watt rigs (a
population much greater than those who own 200 watts rigs) would be at a
significant disadvantage. 3db is a considerable difference in average
signal strength.
It seems to me that this "modest" proposal would create all sorts of
problems without solving any.
Dave AB7E
On 10/10/2016 12:56 AM, Charles Harpole wrote:
With many modern transceivers now offering a top wattage of 200watts, how
about aligning the category of medium power to 200watts??
Ok, I guess K3 owners will become upset, but some feel that radio is so
superior, shouldn't they have to take a little handicap?
I told you my proposal is modest, but then I read Jonathan Swift. 73,
Charly
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|