CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power
From: ".. VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:10:42 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I think any standard should apply to all contests, not just RDXC.  Perhaps a 
small board of respected contesters could be set up to which contest organizers 
would present their proposed adverse actions - not just for power but for other 
infractions - unacknowledged assistance, etc.  The board could be sworn to 
confidentiality to protect sources and methods being used.


Great idea.

However, while the sources should be protected the methods should be open for 
public scrutiny. This way they can be independently verified for reliability 
and accuracy  to a standard that is acceptable to the general contesting 
community. In fact, any software based method used to determine infractions 
should be kept in the public domain so it can be re-tested under new conditions 
and improved with time

Syl - VE5ZX
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>