CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured
From: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:17:22 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I don't believe that CQWW has ever been a contest that truly has had a level 
playing field. Those stations on the continental boundaries have always had a 
big advantage. Not that they really need that scoring advantage because in many 
cases they already enjoy a propagation advantage as well. Plus the US east 
coast has always enjoyed a big advantage because of its proximity to Europe.

I would like to propose the following:

1. Get rid of the tiered points system. Same number of points for each QSO , 
except for maybe the following - 1 point for EU--EU QSO's and 1 point for 
USA/VE to US/VE QSO's.

2. Allow USA to USA QSO'S. This will level the playing field vs EU. If you 
don't like that then only allow QSO's between EU countries for multiplier 
credit only.

3. Make each US state a multiplier. This contest is run by a US organization so 
there should be an incentive added for those outside the US to work us.

Jeff

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>