Hi Rudy:
Just about every competitive sport I can think of regulates or prohibits some
very effective skills, techniques, and (the one item you didn't mention which
is key here) technologies. Many don't have the additional categories to permit
these prohibited items - Radiosport does have the Unlimited category to
accommodate some very effective technologies.
Examples abound. Golf prohibits the use of GPS, rangefinders, and
non-regulation balls and clubs. Major league baseball prohibits aluminum bats
and non-regulation balls. American football prohibits the flying wedge.
Boxing prohibits hitting below the belt.
Radiosport is no different. The only way to eliminate these periodic
discussions about categories and rules would be to eliminate the categories and
rules. This is also a very effective way to eliminate cheating - if there are
no rules, there is no cheating.
73,
Mark, KD4D
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
To: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Cc: "cq-contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 9:06:21 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
So why would a contest encourage participants not to develop new skills and
techniques? Is there any other sport that says "It's OK if you don't want to
get better, we will create a category for you. No worries, mate". This is what
this debate about assisted vs unassisted vs so2r etc is all about.
Rudy N2WQ
Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate
autocorrect.
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 1:50 PM, KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rudy,
>
> From my little experience using SO2R I found that it was a very big help
> just in knowing when to do things like change bands. And many multipliers
> were found on the 2nd band that I would not have otherwise worked. And I am
> not a skilled SO2R op.
>
> From my point of view it's a night and day difference. If you add in
> panadaptors it's even a greater difference. If you add in the Assisted
> class it becomes a click and call matter to work multipliers.
>
> There is nothing wrong with any of that. But the advantage of the 2nd radio
> is, in my opinion, to great to lump them into the same class.
>
> And that's without even considering those super operators who can run on 2
> bands in the dueling CQ mode. I have a great deal of respect for anyone who
> can do that!
>
> OK, back in my hole,
>
> Ron, KU7Y
> Arizona Outlaws Contest Club
> Northern California Contest Club
> Silver Springs, NV
> ku7y@qsl.net
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rudy Bakalov [mailto:r_bakalov@yahoo.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 7:15 AM
>> To: KU7Y
>> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
>>
>> Why would that be?
>>
>> Rudy N2WQ
>>
>> Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or
> inappropriate
>> autocorrect.
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 5, 2016, at 9:54 PM, KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> You're not the only one who feels that way Tony,
>>>
>>> I've said for a long time that SO1R and SO2R should be separate classes.
>>>
>>> OK, back in my hole,
>>>
>>> Ron, KU7Y
>>> Arizona Outlaws Contest Club
>>> Northern California Contest Club
>>> Silver Springs, NV
>>> ku7y@qsl.net
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf
> Of
>>>> N2TK, Tony
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 3:20 PM
>>>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
>>>>
>>>> For my own selfish reasons I would like to see SO1R and SO2R Unassisted
>>>> separate.
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>> N2TK, Tony
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf
> Of
>>> Ed
>>>> Sawyer
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 1:19 PM
>>>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
>>>>
>>>> Ditto the KD4D post.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why don't we let the unassisted operators decide whether the concern of
>>>> assisted ops invading our category is worth eliminating it over the
>>> concern?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No reason to merge the 2 categories and then do an overlay. Just leave
> it
>>>> the way it is and clarify reasonable questions like Braco's question.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> By the way, do to great efforts of the organizations and contest
> managers,
>>>> doesn't the ARRL and CQ contests represent something like 75%+ of all
> the
>>>> contest Qs made in a year? Why exactly should this majority follow the
>>>> "rest of the world" minority? Just sayin.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ed N1UR
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|