To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] W5WMU experiment in NAQP |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
Date: | Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:41:23 -0800 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Fri,1/8/2016 6:01 AM, Stan Stockton wrote: Are there really those who think we should bring everyone down to the lowest level of station and antennas so we can say we have a level playing field? Nope. But NAQP IS A LOW POWER CONTEST. PERIOD. A high power station in NAQP is like a turd in a punch bowl. In NAQP, the competition is more about antennas and operating skills. By all means, use NAQP to test station improvements, but do it within the rules of the contest, which says 100W max. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] W5WMU experiment in NAQP, Chris Hurlbut |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] W5WMU experiment in NAQP, Chris Hurlbut |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] W5WMU experiment in NAQP, Stan Stockton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] W5WMU experiment in NAQP, Steve Sacco NN4X |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |