Any voluntary survey is always going to reflect those who choose to
respond.
If the majority are silent, they deserve to have others' views prevail.
73, Pete N4ZR
Download the new N1MM Logger+ at
<http://N1MM.hamdocs.com>. Check
out the Reverse Beacon Network at
<http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.
On 12/31/2015 4:43 PM, Trent Sampson wrote:
Not a contest goes by from VK4KW where we do not get a heap of emails (300 was
the best) with the constant message - Never worked a VK before..in X years of
hamming
One of the key features of the success of the CQWW was clarity in the rules and
not tinkering with them
It is getting to the point there will be a category for Left handed Single
radio 8 hour Unsociable misfits.
The changes to the CQ WPX have us seriously thinking of doing the ARRL and RDX
the weekend before and skipping the WPX .... as it is becoming obvious many
others are....
One feature of Surveys -
If they are not constructed correctly you will get skewed results
If they are constructed correctly you will get the answer YOU want
If they are constructed properly you may get the answer you don't want to see.
But above all you will have answers from people who take surveys.
Don't make the mistake of listening to the vocal minority and ignoring the
silent majority.
Happy New Year 2016
TrentVK4TS PO Box 275 Mooloolaba 4557 0408497550
Please note I no longer use the WIA email address where possible owing to it
blocking emails from sites such as VK Logger and ARRL.
From: xe2b@outlook.com
To: sbloom@acsalaska.net; cq-contest@contesting.com
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:45:01 +0000
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Uniques, Busted, Bads in CQWW
Right on!!
Luis XE2B
Enviado desde mi Huawei de Telcel
-------- Mensaje original --------
Asunto: Re: [CQ-Contest] Uniques, Busted, Bads in CQWW
De: Stephen Bloom
Para: cq-contest@contesting.com
CC:
I'd have to strongly disagree with this ...
That could be a serious penalty for those of us operating in semi or
genuinely rare entities. I know anytime I'm in a contest ...operating say
on 10M SSB ...if I'm spotted ..I'm going to get some folks who just want
Alaska on 10 ...the only deleted Qs should be for a non existent call sign.
We have to run under the assumption that people aren't cheating if/until we
know otherwise. If it is way out of kilter like UT5UGR .. then follow the
trail.
73
Steve KL7SB
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Olof Lundberg
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 2:30 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Uniques, Busted, Bads in CQWW
Just to add to Doug's excellent discussion of uniques: In Randy's survey I
ticked "Against" on the question re uniques. But then I started to look
deeper into the issue and I am now a convert - uniques should be deleted
(but not penalized) in most contests and certainly in CQWW.
As an example, at 3B8MU in 2014 we had only 0.7% uniques out of 10000+ QSOs
and this was at a semi-rare location. Looking at those uniques I am sure
that quite a few, maybe the majority, were busted calls. I would not be
worried about losing those "uniques" because statistically deletion of
uniques would hit the average player equally - there would be no change in
overall placement.
It would be interesting to see a global analysis of the ratio of uniques to
busted calls. I suspect that those with a high number of uniques also have a
high number of busted calls.
Now there are contests where deletion of uniques might not be appropriate. I
could think of contests with small participation and say 160m contests where
station capability and location is so critical.
There are already contests where uniques are disallowed. In 2014 I did a
relaxed entry in the LZ DX Contest as 3B9HA. There are loads of stations
that don't participate in the LZ Contest but want to work 3B9 so it turned
out that the sponsors only counted 764 of my 1115 QSOs. Fine, I believe I
understand why they do it but the net effect is of course that they
discourage participation by DX stations so in 2015 I stayed away from that
contest while at 3B9.
But in the big contests like the CQ WW and CQ WPX and most other big
contests - yes, just delete the uniques.
73 Olof G0CKV
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|