| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW popularity from EUR Perspective: data | 
| From: | "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> | 
| Reply-to: | sawyered@earthlink.net | 
| Date: | Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:17:59 -0500 | 
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> | 
| There is a reason why CQWW and ARRL DX are uniquely fun based on the format. There seems to be a constant theme of trying to have a global - all band contest with the CQ WW 160 or ARRL 10 Meter format. All areas contacted for points, states and provinces and DXCC are mults. It sounds like a fun NEW contest. Why won't some group passionate about the format organize it? I would suggest the weekend between ARRL DX Phone and Russian DX contest. Or the weekend between the SS contests. Any takers? Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW popularity from EUR Perspective: data, Joe | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW popularity from EUR Perspective: data, Charles Harpole | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] US Call Areas as Multipliers, Radio K0HB | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] States and Provinces as Multipliers in DX Contests, John Laney | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |