CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1
From: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:56:09 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Jim, When you add to this the many stations that say "roger" (an improper CB import for "over" that just does not go away) the Q rate is even further diminished. Why can't the response be solely limited to what the contest requires? Sometimes I get so annoyed with this that I answer back "My name is Herb, not Roger." The other one that is perhaps even worse is "good luck and see you after the contest."


Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ

On 12/19/2015 2:41 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
On Fri,12/18/2015 6:42 PM, Marty s wrote:
It can be pretty annoying. I did the math today. If you were running a 250 hour, and every station added a "please copy" your rate would be down by over 20 stations, it adds up.

And you can bet that "Please Copy" isn't their only time waster. :)

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>