Each year during the 160m ARRL I can see a noticeable increase of the
QSO B4 based on an average 1400 Q's worked during the contest.
Last year I got about 70 and this WE if I had not decided to stop
working them at 40 I would have passed the 100 bar out of 1500 QSO's.
Then I am wondering if on the long term the politic consisting of
working them systematically is a good thing. Of course there are plenty
of different reasons why people are making mistakes and calling a second
time (or a third...) by if it does not get the feedback of its error, on
the long term this population is encouraged in its wrong practice. Then,
not only will not progress but even will regress as it seems to me year
after year.
By the way an example of a very bad side effect of that politic : I made
the mistake to accept to work an European station QSO B4. A few minutes
later I got a pile-up with an avalanche of QSO B4. I immediately
understood that the European station had spotted me with a wrong
callsign. Being at a time when free run frequencies were rare I could
not change, then I refused all the QSO B4 and repeated two times my
callsign expecting that a cleaver guy will send a correction spot. After
the contest I see that it is exactly what happened.
It is after that bad experience that I have decided to systematically
refuse the QSO's B4.
After all, if my callsign is busted in the other guy log, I do not lose
the points but he lose the points and if he answers ''NO'' when I send
QSO B4 then I will work him without discussion.
Interested by your opinion on that point.
Gilles VA2EW
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|