Interesting ...
I did this for NAQP and SSCW without even thinking of it as anything other than
efficient SO2R (not that it mattered ....I was operating from VE7 and no
technique short of remote xcvrs from another part of the country was going to
make me competive with propagation of the time.) Having said that, I can't
even fathom handling the audio streams the way N6MJ does. I'm still recovering
from the pileups at 9H6A.
73
Steve KL7SB
p.s. Joined the group recently ..with Rich passing ..thought another KL7
should be here.
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Björn
SM0MDG
Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 1:46 AM
To: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Cc: sawyered@earthlink.net; cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] High Rate Dual Radio CQing
On 02 Dec 2015, at 17:32, Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com> wrote:
> I agree. It's extremely impressive. Was there a rule change that
> allowed this to happen this year, or did N6MJ and Ct1BOH come up with the
> idea?
There is no rule prohibiting “duelling CQ”, i.e. running on two bands
simultaneously. This is OK with the rules as long as only one signal is
transmitted at any time. I have checked this personally with the CQ contest
promotor a few years ago before adopting this way of operation.
To me this is useful even at low rates at the end of the contest as calling CQ
on two bands are more likely to increase the rate than working just one band.
In addition N1MM is set do this with an additional SO2R controller and two
radios.
73 de Björn,
SM0MDG
SE0X
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|