CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Claiming assistance when not actually assisted

To: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>, David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Claiming assistance when not actually assisted
From: "Fco. Luis Delgadillo" <xe2b@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 18:17:44 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
...can we move on?

This subject is getting nowhere.
74
Luis

Enviado desde mi Huawei de Telcel


-------- Mensaje original --------
Asunto: Re: [CQ-Contest] Claiming assistance when not actually assisted
De: Radio K0HB
Para: David Gilbert
CC: cq-contest@contesting.com


If I use assistance I am not able to qualify as not-assisted.  And vice-versa, 
if I am not-assisted then I obviously am not assisted.  Mutually exclusive.  
East and west.



__73, de Hans, K0HB

"Just a Boy and His Radio"™

On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:26 AM, David Gilbert
wrote:

> I can't be both a boy and a girl at the same time. Something can't be
> both sweet and sour at the same time. East and west never meet.
> But I CAN qualify equally for assisted and non-assisted by doing EXACTLY
> the same thing per the rules in either case. If I can legally choose to
> enter either category without doing anything different, why can't I
> qualify for both? Calling that ludicrous seems ludicrous to me.
> Dave AB7E
> On 12/4/2015 2:50 PM, Radio K0HB wrote:
>> While we're at it we could eliminate the distinction between boys and girls, 
>> the distinction between sweet and sour, and the distinction between east and 
>> west.
>>
>>
>> No, wait a minute those things are different from each other. Combining them 
>> is a ludicrous notion.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Well, so are assisted and not-assisted different from each other, and 
>> combining them in a single category is a ludicrous notion also.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __73, de Hans, K0HB
>>
>> "Just a Boy and His Radio"™
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:53, Tim Shoppa , wrote:
>>
>> At this point I might start asking why not eliminate the distinction
>>
>> between assisted and unassisted, and allow assistance for everyone?
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>